I finally had the opportunity to see the breakout hit of 2017, Jordan Peele's horror comedy smash, Get Out. I didn't really know what to expect going into this film, given it's nearly unanimous support, but I'm happy to report back that it's as good as the reviews say it is... and maybe better.
Get Out works on almost every level. It's a horror film that has equal parts social satire and traditional thriller. The comedic elements in it do not feel forced and the ending had me guessing almost up to the point of the big reveal. It works as a social commentary in ways that haven't been explored before. Essentially, it's meant to satire "well-intentioned" liberal white people, while bringing attention the sense of paranoia that most black people feel when being thrust into an all-white situation. Peele expertly crafts this film together without it ever feeling preachy, or hitting the audience too hard on the head. If I had to boil it down to a label, it's essentially The Stepford Wives meets Guess Who's Coming To Dinner for the modern era. What I found most refreshing about this film was that, in an era of never ending blockbusters and sequels, Get Out is a fresh, original film that is both acted and directed superbly. It tackles racism in a way that hasn't really been presented on film before, and a film that is both timely and relevant in this post 45 world we live in.. It definitely deserves all the accolades (bot critically and commercially) that is being heaped upon it.
For those of you who are not "Horror" people, I still think you can get immense enjoyment out of it. To me, it reminded me of early seasons of Lost, where each episode would get you wanting to learn more. This is how this movie played out to me. Each scene built a sense of foreboding, leading to a climax that was both shocking and rewarding. When the credits rolled on Get Out, I felt satisfied that the movie was over and wanted more a the same time.
The final thing to look out for on this film, is whether or not it will have the legs to last until awards season. As my friend Adam pointed out, a February movie hasn't made the best picture list since Silence Of The Lambs. History is not on Get Out's side, but I think it'll be an awards player.
I'm giving Get Out 3.75 stars out of 4. I had a few bones to pick with it, but they were minor and discussing them would give away the ending. If you haven't seen it yet, get out (see what I did there???) and see it!
Friday, March 17, 2017
Sunday, March 5, 2017
Logan isn't afraid to take chances... and delivers a fantastic standalone film.
In the year 2000, for better or worse, Hollywood changed forever. With the release of the critical and commercial successful X-Men film, Hollywood realized there was gold to mine in the comics that were once regarded as "kids stuff." And mine the comics, they did! It's been almost 20 years since the X-Men gave birth to the modern blockbuster blueprint, and finally, Hollywood is starting to take chances with the material again.
Logan, the graphically violent Wolverine solo story, delivers on all-fronts, and represents a (hopeful) change in the way that these films can and should be presented. Director James Mangold (in his second time directing a Wolverine film) smartly delivers a film that is a part of a larger universe, but also feels fresh enough to stand on its own two legs. Like his other western (the fantastic remake of 3:10 to Yuma), it's a story of the lengths heroes go to do what's right.
The year is 2029, and mutants are almost wiped out. In fact, a new mutant has not been born in almost a quarter century. Logsan (aka Wolverine) has grown old. His healing abilities are greatly delayed. It seems that his once indestructible body is finally starting to betray him. He is left to take care of the once mighty Professor Charles Xavier (played with full piss and vinegar by the wonderful Patrick Stewart), whose own powers are betraying him. It's by chance that a mysterious girl falls into his lap and he's tasked with taking her to Eden, a safe haven for mutant kind. What follows is equal parts Mad Max: Fury Road, Children Of Men, and a blend of a the great Western Films of Hollywood's past. Wolverine has always been a reluctant hero. He's always struggled with his own demons, and this film is no different. However, as Logan seemingly nears the end of his life, we finally get to see Logan come to terms with his centuries of life on this planet. He is the aging gunslinger called back to duty for one final job.
This film is loosely based on the iconic Old Man Logan series of Marvel comics, and I have to say that it lives up to that series of stories quite well. It's a political film (tackling the theme of Us vs. Them), but it doesn't wear it's politics on its sleeves. It features a border wall and tackles racism (in this instance, mankind's attempts at wiping out the mutant race) in subtle ways. It also deals with aging and death in a way that no comic book movie has ever tried to do.
At the end of the day, this is Hugh Jackman showcasing his signature character in ways that have not been seen before. It's one of his better acting performances, not just in X-Men films, but in his lengthy career. It's the rare standalone film that comic book experts and notices can appreciate. There are scant references to the X universe scattered throughout that serve as call outs that are fun to find, but not necessary to appreciate this story. If this truly is Jackman's last run as Wolverine, he goes out on a high note.
Logan works because they've treated the material like it matters. It's not meant to feed the larger shared cinematic universe in any way. Both Mangold and Jackman are allowed to tell the story that they want to tell, and are able to concentrate on story and substance over dollars and cents. Sure, this movie will make a boat load of movie, but it will do so because it's a genuinely thrilling story where the stakes matter and the characters have meaning and depth to them.
I'm giving Logan 3.5 out of 4 stars. It definitely earns it's R-rating. It takes chances to focus on telling a singular story, and those chances pay off. I'd definitely see it whether it's your first X-Men viewing or your tenth. It's not a perfect film, but it's definitely got a shot at the best comic book movie of 2017. Hell, I'll bet good money it'll make my top 10 of the year.
Logan, the graphically violent Wolverine solo story, delivers on all-fronts, and represents a (hopeful) change in the way that these films can and should be presented. Director James Mangold (in his second time directing a Wolverine film) smartly delivers a film that is a part of a larger universe, but also feels fresh enough to stand on its own two legs. Like his other western (the fantastic remake of 3:10 to Yuma), it's a story of the lengths heroes go to do what's right.
The year is 2029, and mutants are almost wiped out. In fact, a new mutant has not been born in almost a quarter century. Logsan (aka Wolverine) has grown old. His healing abilities are greatly delayed. It seems that his once indestructible body is finally starting to betray him. He is left to take care of the once mighty Professor Charles Xavier (played with full piss and vinegar by the wonderful Patrick Stewart), whose own powers are betraying him. It's by chance that a mysterious girl falls into his lap and he's tasked with taking her to Eden, a safe haven for mutant kind. What follows is equal parts Mad Max: Fury Road, Children Of Men, and a blend of a the great Western Films of Hollywood's past. Wolverine has always been a reluctant hero. He's always struggled with his own demons, and this film is no different. However, as Logan seemingly nears the end of his life, we finally get to see Logan come to terms with his centuries of life on this planet. He is the aging gunslinger called back to duty for one final job.
This film is loosely based on the iconic Old Man Logan series of Marvel comics, and I have to say that it lives up to that series of stories quite well. It's a political film (tackling the theme of Us vs. Them), but it doesn't wear it's politics on its sleeves. It features a border wall and tackles racism (in this instance, mankind's attempts at wiping out the mutant race) in subtle ways. It also deals with aging and death in a way that no comic book movie has ever tried to do.
At the end of the day, this is Hugh Jackman showcasing his signature character in ways that have not been seen before. It's one of his better acting performances, not just in X-Men films, but in his lengthy career. It's the rare standalone film that comic book experts and notices can appreciate. There are scant references to the X universe scattered throughout that serve as call outs that are fun to find, but not necessary to appreciate this story. If this truly is Jackman's last run as Wolverine, he goes out on a high note.
Logan works because they've treated the material like it matters. It's not meant to feed the larger shared cinematic universe in any way. Both Mangold and Jackman are allowed to tell the story that they want to tell, and are able to concentrate on story and substance over dollars and cents. Sure, this movie will make a boat load of movie, but it will do so because it's a genuinely thrilling story where the stakes matter and the characters have meaning and depth to them.
I'm giving Logan 3.5 out of 4 stars. It definitely earns it's R-rating. It takes chances to focus on telling a singular story, and those chances pay off. I'd definitely see it whether it's your first X-Men viewing or your tenth. It's not a perfect film, but it's definitely got a shot at the best comic book movie of 2017. Hell, I'll bet good money it'll make my top 10 of the year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)